热门站点| 世界资料网 | 专利资料网 | 世界资料网论坛
收藏本站| 设为首页| 首页

关于中央企业工程建设领域突出问题专项治理整改工作的指导意见

作者:法律资料网 时间:2024-07-22 01:45:57  浏览:8996   来源:法律资料网
下载地址: 点击此处下载

关于中央企业工程建设领域突出问题专项治理整改工作的指导意见

国务院国有资产监督管理委员会


关于中央企业工程建设领域突出问题专项治理整改工作的指导意见

国资发纪检[2010]171号


各中央企业:

  为切实做好中央企业工程建设领域突出问题专项治理(以下简称工程治理)整改工作,正确把握政策界限,抓好问题的分类处理,根据国务院办公厅和中央治理工程建设领域突出问题工作领导小组办公室关于认真做好工程建设领域有关工作的要求,结合中央企业实际,现就中央企业工程治理整改工作提出如下指导意见:

  一、整改工作的原则

  开展工程治理整改工作,是中央企业工程治理工作的重要步骤。搞好整改工作,对于规范企业管理,促进企业深化改革、结构调整、构建惩防体系,从源头上最大限度地减少违规违纪违法问题的发生具有重要意义。各中央企业要注意把握以下原则,切实搞好整改工作。

  (一)立足当前,着眼长远。解决工程建设领域当前的突出问题与企业管理体制、机制和制度等长远建设相结合。一要对影响实施项目进度、安全、质量和造成损失的问题迅速纠正,立即整改。对于没有完工的项目,要坚持动态监管、全程监督;对于新开工项目,要滚动摸排、跟踪督查。二要着眼长远健全制度,注意与同行业中工程建设项目管理比较好的企业对标、找差距,高起点抓整改,标本兼治、综合治理,促进企业项目管理体制、机制、制度的完善和管理方式的改进,整体提升项目管理水平。

  (二)突出重点,整体推进。在整体推进整改工作的同时,要抓好重点,合理安排。一要着重针对项目决策、质量安全管理、招投标、物资采购和资金使用等问题多发易发环节,制订整改措施。二要根据项目进展程度把握重点,对于已竣工的项目,以认真总结经验教训,完善管理制度和方式为主,确保既有效提高管理水平又避免类似问题再次发生;对于在建工程以立即整改、及时纠偏为重点,该报批的报批、该补办的补办、该规范的规范;对于发生问题并产生不良后果的要坚决整改,根据相关规定严肃处理。三要统筹兼顾,系统治理,整体推进,确保整改工作不留死角。

  (三)区别对待,分类处理。对相关责任人的处理要实事求是,讲究政策。一是对程序性违规的,要区别处理。对一般性违规的,以批评教育、吸取教训、督促整改为主;对严重违规并造成严重后果的,必须调查处理、追究责任。二是对造成资产损失的,要认定责任,给责任单位和责任人以相应的责任追究。三是对违法违纪、以权谋私的,由相应管理部门给予党政纪处分;对于涉嫌违法犯罪的责任人,一经核实,依法处理。四是对主动认识和纠正问题的,可以按照有关规定从轻、减轻或免于处罚;对掩盖问题或弄虚作假、拒不整改的,要严肃处理;对边查边犯、顶风违纪的,要从严处理,绝不姑息。

  二、突出问题的整改

  各中央企业要从人员素质、管理模式、内部控制、业务流程、制度建设、监督检查等方面深入分析产生问题的原因,确定整改重点,制订整改计划,有针对性地搞好整改工作。

  (一)纠正违规决策及审批行为。一要进一步完善投资决策体系,严格决策程序,建立和完善投资管理机制,纠正违反非主业投资管理规定、计划外投资管理无序、违规使用银行信贷资金、过度负债投资等问题。二要抓紧补办项目土地使用证、环境影响评价证、施工许可证等基建相关审批手续,纠正项目审批程序不合规的问题。三要建立并严格执行项目论证程序,建立和完善项目储备制度,切实做好项目勘察、设计、论证分析等前期工作,确保投资计划和项目预算下达后即可完成开工准备,及时开工建设,纠正项目立项论证不充分、可行性研究不深、预算不实、实施方案不细的问题。四要规范变更设计管理,坚持“先批准、后变更”原则,严格控制重大设计变更,完善变更报批手续,纠正不按规定申报变更设计内容、调整项目实施内容的问题,严禁边审批、边设计、边施工现象。

  (二)纠正违规招标行为。一要着重纠正不按招标项目批复内容招标、擅自改变招标方式、随意使用邀请招标、公开招标比例不高,甚至不招标的问题。二要取消违反公开、公正、公平原则,擅自设立的行业或企业系统保护性招标条款。三要纠正不按法定要求的内容、时间和媒体发布招标信息的问题。四要着重纠正投标资质预审不严格、不按规定确定评标委员会组成人员、不按规定确定中标单位的问题。五要纠正评标不严格、走过场,甚至“违规分包”等违规问题。

  (三)纠正质量安全管理方面的违规行为。一要辞退没有监理资质或监理资质等级不够的单位和没有监理资格的人员;明确监理责任,按照规定要求,纠正监理工作流程不规范、项目监理资料不齐全不完整的问题;加强对主体结构工程使用的钢材、水泥、商品混凝土等主要材料和主要设备的质量监理,加强对工程施工技术标准的监理。二要立即按规定配备安全管理人员,纠正违章指挥、违章操作和违反劳动纪律等不安全行为。三要严格合同会签和审批手续,纠正合同管理不规范,条款约定不明确、不严谨,合同实质性内容与招标文件及投标承诺不一致,甚至先开工后签合同的现象;加强对合同履行的跟踪监督,按合同支付款项、结算和索赔处理。

  (四)纠正违反资金安排使用管理的违规行为。对于资金管理不规范的问题,要及时调整账户、明确责任,严格落实资金专账(户)、专人管理,单独核算制度。项目单位要做到项目分账核算,资金专款专用,成本规范归集,及时编制竣工财务决算,按照规定妥善处理项目结余资金。加强对建设资金预算管理,定期考核资金预算的编制和执行情况,及时发现纠正扩大支出范围的行为。严格项目合同管理,规范价款结算。对未经批准擅自改变资金用途的问题,如同意调整的项目,按规定办理追加或追减预算,其中调减预算的,调减部分收回投资方,属于中央投资的,上缴中央国库;对不同意调整的项目,除可按原已下达预算执行外,不宜执行的部分收回投资方,属于中央投资的,上缴中央国库。对项目整体竣工验收和决算工作滞后的问题,要抓紧搞好竣工验收和决算工作。对造成经济损失的按照《中央企业资产损失责任追究暂行办法》(国资委令第20号)和有关规定处理。

  (五)纠正物资采购中的违规行为。一要重点纠正大宗物资不按规定招投标或比质比价的行为。二要纠正和处理物资采购质量伪劣、数量虚假等问题。三要纠正和处理违反《国有企业领导人员廉洁从业若干规定》,在物资采购过程中搞关联交易的行为。

  (六)畅通群众监督渠道,加大案件查办力度。要拓宽举报渠道并向社会公布,切实发挥群众监督的作用。对群众举报的反映工程建设领域存在的突出问题,要及时组织查处。要坚决查处领导人员利用职权违反相关规定干预和插手建设工程招投标活动的问题;坚决查处围标、串标和虚假招标的问题;坚决查处在工程发包、物资采购过程中的商业贿赂等问题。

  三、长效机制的建设

  (一)完善企业项目决策管理。以贯彻落实《关于进一步推进国有企业贯彻落实“三重一大”决策制度的意见》(中办发〔2010〕17号)为契机,建立健全企业法人治理结构,完善企业内部决策制衡机制,抓紧制定企业的实施办法,健全完善企业内部各项议事规则,进一步明确项目建议、可行性研究、工程设计等环节决策主体的决策事项和权限,完善专家咨询、科学论证与集体决策相结合的决策程序,建立决策回避制度和项目后评估制度,形成决策失误纠错改正和责任追究机制,有效提升建设项目科学决策水平。

  (二)健全企业项目管理制度体系。一要对企业制度进行系统梳理,尤其要做好招标投标、物资采购、资金使用管理、质量安全和项目决策管理制度的梳理完善工作。特别是改制、重组后的企业,一定要抓紧制度的清理,确保制度与企业体制相适应。二要检查制度的合法性。对企业项目管理制度与有关法规相抵触、不体现法规要求、不明确表述法规内容的要坚决纠正,确保制度与相关法律法规不抵触、不缺失、不违反。三要检查制度的配套性。对于有权利无义务、有决策无执行、有激励无约束、有监督无追究等制度不配套的,要建立和完善项目管理责任追究等项目管理制度体系,确保项目管理制度与管理机制相适应,做到制度体系基本完整、总体配套、没有重大缺失。四要检查制度的可控性。按照权利、义务和责任相统一的原则,明确规定各有关部门和业务单位、岗位、人员应负的责任和奖惩制度;对授权不清楚、职责不明确、权限不明确、程序不明确、监督不明确的要及时建立健全,确保制度与内控制度相一致,具有控制力。五要检查制度的实用性。对于不适用、操作性不强的要修改完善,确保制度与实际情况相符合,保证项目管理制度可操作、有效、管用。

  (三)加强企业风险管理。一要开展全面风险管理工作。建立健全风险管理组织体系,包括规范的公司法人治理结构,风险管理职能部门、内部审计部门和法律事务部门以及其他有关职能部门、业务单位的组织领导机构及其职责。具备条件的企业应全面推进,尽快建立全面风险管理体系。二要建立项目投资、招标、资金管理等重要岗位权力制衡制度,明确规定授权批准、业务经办、会计记录、财产保管和稽核检查等不相容职责的分离。对内控所涉及的重要岗位可设置一岗双人、双职、双责,相互制约。所有项目参建单位工作人员,以及工程监测、检测、咨询评估及施工图审查等单位工作人员,按各自职责对经手的工程质量负终身责任。三要明确该岗位的上级部门或人员对其应采取的监督措施和应负的监督责任;具备条件的企业应把各业务单位风险管理执行情况与绩效薪酬挂钩。四要重点围绕投资决策、财务管理、物资设备采购、招投标、质量安全管理、劳务管理以及用人管理等,查找辨识风险点,制订切实有效的防范应对措施,抓好工程建设领域风险防范工作。

  (四)提高项目管理科学化水平。一要改进管理方式,提高集团管控力。要推行资金集中管理、招投标集中管理、物资采购集中管理等管理模式,通过集团化运作,减少风险环节,有效避免腐败行为的发生。二要加强工程项目管理信息化建设,推进项目管理业务网上公开、网上运行、网上监督,用信息技术的稳定性保证项目管理公开透明、规范操作,提高项目管理网络化、智能化和科学化水平。三要加强诚信体系建设,严格资格、资质预审,加强对供货商、承包商、承建方和专家库信用评估管理,实行“黑名单”管理制度,搞好诚信信息发布通报,建立和实行项目后评价制度,增强项目管理的科学性。

  (五)建立健全监督和考核机制。一要把企业内部各种单项检查协调统筹好,建立经常性的综合检查制度,规范监督检查工作。二要积极开展项目管理效能监察,加强对项目管理行为的过程监督,提高项目管理制度的执行力,保证项目实施从决策到执行过程的合法、合规,操作过程正确、有效,项目管理秩序正常、有序,促进企业实现项目管理效能。三要加强内部审计,保证建设资金高效、安全运行,增强内控机制的有效性。四要把工程建设中执行《国有企业领导人员廉洁从业若干规定》的情况作为党风廉政建设责任制考核的重要内容,作为民主生活会、企业领导人员述职述廉的重要内容,作为厂务公开的重要内容,加强考核,形成“谁建设、谁负责,谁主管、谁负责”的责任约束机制。

  四、有关工作要求

  (一)高度重视,加强领导。各中央企业要从深化改革、加强管理、构建惩防体系、加强党风廉政建设、全面提升企业抗风险力和竞争力的高度,深刻认识工程治理整改工作的重要性、必要性。各级工程治理工作领导小组要认真履行职责,定期召开会议,研究部署工作,协调解决重要问题,在企业内部形成党政统一领导、纪检监察机构组织协调、有关业务部门配合,分工协作、分级负责、上下联动的领导体制和工作机制,有效地将整改工作引向深入。

  (二)加强协调,整合资源。各中央企业工程治理工作领导小组及其办公室要进一步发挥发动、组织、协调功能,认真制订整改方案、细化工作计划;要加强与业务部门之间的联系,整合企业内部各种资源,建立企业内部业务部门与审计、纪检等部门信息共享的工作协调机制,畅通信息渠道,形成监督合力,保持并发展齐抓共管的工作格局。

  (三)明确责任,抓好落实。各中央企业要明确各部门及所属企业在工程治理整改阶段的任务和责任,细化责任分工,明确工作任务、整改要求和完成期限;要按照一级抓一级、层层抓落实、责任到人、工作到位的要求,加强督导检查,注意发现和解决影响工作落实的深层次问题,及时发现新情况,并提出有针对性的治理办法;要认真总结推广项目管理和工程治理工作的有效做法和经验,广泛宣传,扩大影响,不断提高整改工作的质量和水平。

                         国务院国有资产监督管理委员会
                            二○一○年十一月五日


下载地址: 点击此处下载

山西省人民代表大会常务委员会关于常务委员会工作机构设置的决议

山西省人大常委会


山西省人民代表大会常务委员会关于常务委员会工作机构设置的决议
山西省人大常委会


(1988年3月10日山西省第七届人民代表大会常务委员会第二次会议通过)


山西省第七届人民代表大会常务委员会第二次会议,为了适应加强地方人大工作的需要,根据地方组织法的规定,重新研究了常务委员会工作机构设置的问题,特作如下决议:
一、原政治法律工作委员会改为法制工作委员会;撤销法制室,其工作任务归入法制工作委员会。
二、设立人事代表工作委员会。
三、继续保留财政经济工作委员会、农村工作委员会、教育科学文化卫生工作委员会、环境保护工作委员会和办公厅。



1988年3月10日

The Draft Constitution and Human Rights Protection in European Union

周大勇 (Zhou,Dayong)

1 the general introduction of the draft constitution in aspect of the human rights
2 short review of the human rights protection in European Union
3 the new points in aspect of human rights in the draft constitution
3.1 common values
3.2 incorporation of the Charter of fundamental rights
3.3 other changes could affect the human rights
4 arisen questions
4.1 the protection different from under the Convention
4.2 the two courts system and its application
5 conclusions in a historical view




1 general introduction of the draft constitution in aspect of the human rights

“Conscious that Europe is a continent that has brought forth civilization; That its inhabitants, arriving in successive waves from earliest times, have gradually developed the values underlying humanism: equality of persons, freedom, respect for reason” Extract from the preamble to the draft Constitution

In past 16 years, the European Union (EU hereafter) has marked itself through a series of changes. From The Single European Act, in which the Union committed itself to create a single market and at the same time establish on its territory the freedom of movement of people, goods, services as well as capital, to Maastricht Treaty, which brought the Union into reality and led to common foreign policy and cooperation in the area of justice and internal affairs as a higher level cooperation among Member States. Then the following Amsterdam (1997) and Nice (2001) Treaties, strengthened cooperation in foreign and security policy and placed Justice and Home Affairs matters and established the frame for the Union as a legitimate institution, in which people from different nations integrated in a large region would have common historical direction and splendid future before them. Just before the door of enlargement of the Union, it was argued that the Union has to improve democracy and transparency as well as efficiency, in order to outlines the EU’s purpose and competence clearly and streamline structures so as to prevent paralysis, therefore a new constitution for the Union is determined to replace the EU's series of key treaties in passed over the last 50 years as a single document .

Under leading of former French President and master draftsman Valéry Giscard d'Estaing, the European Convention set about its work of drafting the European Union's first ever full-fledged constitution. With the convention's work completed, the draft must now be finalized by an Intergovernmental Conference of European leaders that is expected to complete deliberations by the end of the 2003. As far as our topic is concerned, noticeably modifications come out in the constitution contract, first of all, the incorporation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, which we will discuss later. In the beginning it is meaningful to consider the statues of the draft constitution in the progress course of the Union. The Union desires to bring peace and prosperity, to promote economic and social progress through continuously integrating market and expanding freedom under light of united institution and social systems . These goals, however, are the foundation of development and protection of human rights . That means, if we regard human rights as a series right which realized at first in peaceful and law-ruling society, then the Union has already kept on entrenching to appreciate these goal from beginning on, and now by means of perusing such goal in a larger region through enlargement, the EU’s influence extent to broader area and more people.

The draft constitution then in such context should be viewed as another historical phase in the process. Because the promoting of well-being and fortune of people depend not only on the development of economic situation and adding some single freedom clauses into the governmental documents, but also upon the entire politic system and background in which we live. Without governing based on democratic and effective institutional structure, and especially a ripe legislation and judiciary mechanism, the realization and protection of human rights could only be on the paper. This is also one of the motive caused the Declaration on the future of the European Union which committed the Union to becoming more democratic, more transparent and effective, in order to pave the way for a Constitution in response to the expectations of the people of Europe . In this perspective, one shall recognize the Constitution as a moving forward step of the whole EU institutionalization targeting its goal, so that to discuss the Constitution in connection with the human right protection, it is helpful to review the human rights protection in Europe and, especially in EU.

2 short review of the human rights protection in European Union

The protection of human rights has been internationally come to life in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948 (UDHR) with reorganization of disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind and respect for inherent dignity as well as the equal rights of all members of the human. This declaration states explicitly that the rights and freedoms of humans have to be guaranteed without distinction and destruction by any group, state or person. These principles were broadly accepted by European countries, considering the origin of the EU (EC) and the historical separation in Europe after WWII, we denote only the contracting countries of European Community.

For the Member States of EC, the Council of Europe has been up to now the most important instrument, which established in 1949 as a result of the Congress of Europe in The Hague , and took for the basic of the human rights protection. The Council accepted the principles of Universal Declaration of Human Rights and integrated it into The European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights (the Convention hereafter), which and its 12 Protocols turned out to be the significant resource for Human Rights protection in Europe. Because of the existence of the Convention, the other two organizations established in the same age aftermath of the Second World War, i.e. OEEC and the European Communities didn’t include relevant clauses for Human Rights protection into their founding treaties. Since it was agreed at that time, the Council of Europe would focus on the protection of human rights, fundamental freedoms and democratic values, whereas the OECD and the European Communities were to be concerned with the economic restoration of Europe. The reason of separate organizations was based on a view to avoiding economic excuses for future inhumanity. Another reason came from the thought, which believed that the process of economic integration set forth in the Community Treaties could not lead to a violation of human rights. Furthermore, the original Member States in the Treaty of Rome feared, that the inclusion of a "bill of rights" in the Treaty might have brought about an undesirable expansion of Community powers, since it could lead Community institutions to interpret their powers as extending to anything not explicitly prohibited by the enumerated guarantees.

Under the regime of Council of Europe, a lots of achievement of human rights improvement has been reached , yet along with the development and expansion of EU, another mechanism on protection of human rights which does not totally rely on the Council of Europe has derived out on one hand, on the other hand being lack of provisions ruling human rights protection in the Treaty establishing EC did not prevent the EC and the later European Union from providing care for the protection against the violations on human rights. Naturally, how could a swelling supranational organization as EC, which has been continually strengthening its power in all social aspects, does not involve in human rights issues especially when the consciousness of human rights nowadays become more significant both in international and national stages? Regarding to EU, The protection system has been formed in three aspects.

First of all, the legislation in the Member States of EU. Since there were no Member States of EU (EC) which accedes to the Community without being a member of the Council of Europe, and according to the Convention, it impose obligations on the Member States that they should ensure that the internal laws and practices comply with the human rights standards set out in the instruments. Very member states in EU have recognize the principles derived from the Convention and incorporated them somehow into national laws, most importantly, provided constitutive protection as the basic legal resource for human rights protection. For example in Germany, Basic Law (Grundgesetz) Art 1 to 19 deliver explicit provisions even beyond the Convention; the same case as Part VIII (§71-85) in Constitution of Denmark ; in Britain the Act of Human Rights came into force on 2 October 2000 steers extending a ways, in which the Convention can be used before domestic courts. Certainly, according to the classic human rights lessons, the basic protection of human rights could only be afforded at the national level through national legislation and excise of authoritative power.

Secondly, the institutions and legislation at the EU level acts also with high respect to the human rights protection. The EU has showed its commitment to human rights and fundamental freedoms and has explicitly confirmed the EU's attachment to fundamental social rights ever since its establishment.

The Amsterdam Treaty established procedures intended to secure their protection. It was ascertained, as a general principle, that the European Union should respect human rights and fundamental freedoms, upon which the Union is founded. For the first time a procedure is introduced, according to which severe and continuing violations of Fundamental Rights can lead to suspension of voting and other rights of a member state, if the Union determined the existence of a serious and persistent breach of these principles by that Member State. As to the Candidate countries, they should also respect these principles to join the Union. Furthermore, It has also given the European Court of Justice the power to ensure respect of fundamental rights and freedoms by the European institutions. In accordance with the inner requirement for the implementation of development cooperation operations, in order to reach objective of developing and consolidating democracy, EU also need its rule respecting for human rights. Such cases we have are for instance the EU Council’s regulation on human rights, Council Regulation (EC) No 975/199 and Council Regulation (EC) No 976/1999 for example, are aimed at providing technical and financial aid for operations to promote and protect of civil and political rights as well as economic, social and cultural rights etc.

Likewise, at their meeting in Cologne in June 1999, EU leaders declared that in respect to the current stage of progress of the European Union, the fundamental rights applicable at Union level should be pushed forward, namely be consolidated in a Charter and thereby made more evident. They argued, that the legal resources of human rights protection come from not only the European Convention of Human Right, but also from various international conventions drawn up by the Council of Europe as well as the United Nations and the International Labor Organization, they also include EU treaties themselves and from the case law of the European Court of Justice. As a result, a Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (the Charter hereinafter) was sketch out, which highlighted the EU’s respect for human rights, for fundamental freedoms and for the principle of democracy through listing more rights a more precise definition of the common values comparing the early documents including the Convention. We will continue to concentrate on the Charter in point 3 since it has been integrated in the draft Constitution as an outstanding achievement.

Finally, the opinion and case-law of European Court of Justice (ECJ hereafter) also have immense impact on the establishment of the instrument of human rights protection within EU.

Although the jurisprudence developed by the ECJ recognizes the Convention as the standard-setter in cases in which the Court has to consider and decide a human rights issue, since there were no relevant legislation existed in the frame of the Community, the ECJ furnish itself power in this aspect by means of case-law. Earlier in 1974, the ECJ first made reference to the ECHR in the Nold judgment, in which the ECJ emphasized its commitment to fundamental human rights based on the constitutional traditions of the Member States’ fundamental rights form an integral part of the general principles of law which the Court enforces. In assuring the protection of such rights, the Court is required to base itself on the constitutional traditions common to the Member States and therefore could not allow measures, which are incompatible with the fundamental rights recognized and guaranteed by the constitutions of such States. The ECJ declared, that the international treaties on the protection of human rights in which the Member States have cooperated or to which they have adhered could also supply indications which may be taken into account within the framework of Community law.

That implied, even without clear regulations in the treaties, the remedy against violation on human rights could also be provided within the framework of the Community in respect for the common traditions applied to the Member States, and in connection with we have mentioned about the Member States’ above, the principles and resource applied to the Member States derived from the Council of Europe. Thus a EU standard could be established by transform a rating comparison of the members’ legal systems to the case-law in ECJ in respect for human rights.

版权声明:所有资料均为作者提供或网友推荐收集整理而来,仅供爱好者学习和研究使用,版权归原作者所有。
如本站内容有侵犯您的合法权益,请和我们取得联系,我们将立即改正或删除。
京ICP备14017250号-1